As though retirement accounts were not complicated enough, two recent court rulings threw monkey wrenches into the works. All IRA owners will want to know about these new IRA rules before planning their estate or transferring money between IRAs.
One rule came out of tax court: IRA owners are limited to one 60-day rollover between IRAs in a 12-month period across all of their IRA accounts. The rule went into effect on Jan. 1, 2015.
The Supreme Court handed down the second rule from on high. Spendthrift heirs take heed: Inherited IRAs are not retirement accounts. That means that inherited IRAs are treated like all other inherited assets and it’s open season for creditors.
In January 2014, Alvan and Elisa Bobrow made an appearance in the U.S. Tax Court to plead their case regarding a string of 60-day rollovers among their IRA accounts. With the 60-day rollover, or once-per-year transfer, a check is cut directly to the account owner with the understanding that the funds must be back in an IRA within 60 days or the funds will become subject to taxes and penalties. Before the 2014 decision, the understanding was that one transfer could be done in a 12-month period for each IRA owned.
You can see how this could be tempting, under the right circumstances.
People would basically use this — not commonly, but occasionally — as basically a form of personal loans, like you could sort of borrow money from your IRA without tax consequences by sequencing together a bunch of 60-day rollovers and actually get a pretty long use of the money.
Death of a loophole
That’s what the Bobrows tried to do, but one of the rollovers didn’t quite make the 60-day deadline. They went to tax court anyway to plead the case.
The conclusion of the tax court was that not only had (they) clearly just botched one of the rollovers on timing, but the tax court’s interpretation was that this shouldn’t just apply to one IRA at a time, this should apply in the aggregate across all of the IRAs.
So the Bobrows ruined it for everyone. Now all IRA owners are limited to doing one of these 60-day transfers annually, no matter how many IRAs they happen to own.
But once a year — that’s not the calendar year. The rule is it’s a fiscal year; in other words, 12 months or 365 days. So, if you did one today, you couldn’t do another one until next July 23 or whatever today is.
Be sure to note
In November 2014, the IRS published a notice clarifying how the new rule works for those who have multiple IRAs. No matter how many IRAs a person may own — a SEP IRA, a SIMPLE IRA, five Roth IRAs and three traditional IRAs — they will get one once-per-year IRA rollover every 365 days.
It’s important to note that the rule doesn’t apply to trustee-to-trustee transfers, the type of transfer that is done between brokerages. If a check is involved, it will be made payable to the brokerage or bank, for benefit of the client’s account, but the client won’t access the funds. “You can do those all day long. You can do 15 a day if you wanted,” Slott says.
Since the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, the status of inherited IRAs with regard to creditors has been as clear as swamp mud. The Supreme Court’s decision this year clarified matters.
In this 2005 law, limits were stated. Basically, any ‘real’ retirement plan — employer qualified retirement plan, or QRP — was fully exempt, plus SEPs, SIMPLEs and 403(b) plans.
Generally, owners of workplace retirement plans enjoy federal protection from creditors, and states determine if a person’s IRA is creditor-protected.
But what happens if you bequeath your IRA to your kid? No one was really sure if inherited IRAs counted as retirement plans or piles of money. The question ended up in front of the Supreme Court in 2014. The court decided that inherited IRAs are piles of money, not retirement accounts.
An exception to the rule
There is one exception: the spousal rollover. When spouses inherit an IRA, they can take the account and use it as their own retirement account.
Some are arguing this could be construed as an illegal transfer or conveyance. My personal feeling is that this argument fills up a lot of seminars on the subject, but it is a stretch to assume or predict that the IRS, or any bankruptcy court, could easily challenge a spouse who took over his or her deceased partner’s retirement plan and treated it as their own.
In other words, a spousal rollover could be challenged by creditors, but the law seems to favor spouses.
Protecting spendthrift heirs
There are some ways to protect heirs from themselves: for instance, by leaving assets to a trust. Leaving an IRA to a trust is more complicated than leaving regular money.
Another option skips the hassle and uncertainty of leaving an IRA to a trust: Take the money out of the IRA and buy life insurance.
You could leave the IRA to a trust, but that’s complicated because the IRA has distribution rules. So it gets complicated to throw that into a trust; life insurance is a much easier asset to go to a trust. Spend down some of your IRA, put the rest in a life insurance policy. Leave that to a trust for the kids.
That way, the kids will end up with tax-free money with no distribution rules attached. Plus the money would be creditor-protected.
Contact a professional advisor that will protect you and you money from these new rules. The government is waiting for you to make a mistake.